Welcome, visitor! [ Register | Login


rentwithpetscanada


Post Free Listing

Help Protect Calves From Veal Industry Cruelty

Animal Justice February 6, 2017

How the Proposed Veal Code of Practice Fails Calves and What You Can Do to Help

Calves used by the Canadian veal industry endure tremendous suffering. These babies are stolen away from their mothers shortly after birth, then isolated in tiny crates with hard, barren floors—denying them every natural instinct and urge.

The National Farm Animal Care Council—the industry group that creates guidelines for the treatment of animals in Canada—has released a new draft code of practice for veal calves, and it is open for public comment.

Now is the time to speak up for calves. Please take a moment to send in your comments before the February 14 deadline!

ACT NOW

The draft guidelines do not require farmers to follow many animal management practices that the latest welfare science indicates are the bare minimum to reduce suffering. Indeed, the science summarized by the Council’s own scientific advisory committee is too often unheeded in the draft guidelines, indefensibly sacrificing animal welfare for farmer convenience.

Some specific shortcomings with the draft guidelines include:

The draft guidelines permit calves to be isolated, even though the evidence (and common sense) is clear that calves crave social contact. Like all newborn babies, veal calves are biologically motivated to seek warmth, comfort, and social interaction. Taking calves from their mothers and isolating them from each other is cruel.

The draft code of practice permits farmers to keep calves on hard, barren floors. In addition to being uncomfortable, the scientific report indicates that hard flooring and/or a lack of bedding is also associated with a wide range of injuries and health problems.

Bursitis is painful joint inflammation, commonly caused by hard flooring in veal calf facilities. Despite it being a common, painful, and preventable condition, the draft guidelines only require addressing environmental issues if three consecutive groups of calves exceed a 15 percent rate of bursitis.

The scientific report indicates that if calves were left with their mothers, they would nurse ten times each day in the first week of life. The frequency would gradually decrease until natural weaning around nine months. The scientific advisory committee identified numerous serious health problems with a low frequency of daily feedings, yet the draft guidelines require only two feedings per day—a frequency that research has clearly associated with suffering.

Like all newborn babies, calves are born with a physical and psychological need to suckle. The scientific advisory committee identified numerous benefits associated with suckling on teats vs drinking milk from buckets, observing that “calves are highly motivated to suck.” Despite this, the draft guidelines don’t require the use of teats, suggesting only that farmers “consider” using teats.

The scientific advisory committee found that calves with average blood haemoglobin of ? 4.8 mmol/L (7.7 g/dL) were anemic, negatively affecting their appetite, growth, energy, and immunity. However, the draft guidelines only require iron supplementation when calves are “found to have” blood haemoglobin below 4.5 mmol/L (7.2 g/dL)—at which point the calves would be severely anemic. Moreover, farmers aren’t even required to actually monitor blood haemoglobin!

*

As legal experts in animal law, we at Animal Justice make it our mission to identify and explain the many ways our animal welfare laws fail animals. With your help as concerned and engaged citizens, we can push to improve laws and policies.

However, consumers should remember that suffering is inherent in veal farming. Calves are literally waste products of the dairy industry, as cows must be impregnated to produce milk. These babies have been taken from their mothers within hours of birth, causing immense distress to both mother and baby. As together we move the ball forward on legal protections for animals, we consumers always have the power to vote with our wallets by boycotting industries that harm animals.

Photo by Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals

Animal Justice

Sponsored Links

  • Figaro

    by on July 11, 2018 - 0 Comments

    I wanted to give you a little update on Figaro. It's hard to believe that we've had her for nearly two months! She's settled in beautifully and we LOVE her. We've come to know her as a very sweet, quirky little kitty. She always seems to be near us, frequently comes for pets, sleeps with Second Chance Animal Rescue Society

  • Mercedes

    by on June 25, 2018 - 0 Comments

    Hi SCARS! I’d like to thank everyone at SCARS for the work you do! A year ago we adopted our sweet little girl from you. Her name was Mercedes and we kept that name. To remind you, she was the gray poodle X, the one with the spinal injury in her back leg. I am Second Chance Animal Rescue Society

  • White House Bans CNN Reporter Who Asked Trump About Cohen And Putin

    by on July 27, 2018 - 0 Comments

    White House Bans CNN Reporter Who Asked Trump About Cohen And PutinThe White House banned CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins from a press event on


    Animal and Pet News

  • Pitch

    by on July 28, 2018 - 0 Comments

    Hey SCARS, Pitch here just wanting to give a 1 year update. I found my furever home last year when my mama came to look at my brother storm. I made such an impact on her that she ended up taking me home instead! My mom says I’m such a panther! I love telling her Second Chance Animal Rescue Society

  • Sandy

    by on July 8, 2018 - 0 Comments

    Hi SCARS! I wanted to give you an update on Sandy! It's been just over a year since I adopted him - June 25th last year. Now I can't imagine my life without him. I remember the day I got him. I drove all the way up from Cochrane with my mom and as soon Second Chance Animal Rescue Society

Article Categories

Article Archives

Who's Online

  • 0 Members.
  • 3 Guests.